Tuesday, March 18, 2014

In spite of being "very concerned" with cell phone rates, Flaherty did nothing about it in the 2014 budget, and now...

Here's what the major gougers did overnight:

Wireless carriers hike prices across Canada


says this morning's headlines.

"Canada’s big three wireless carriers have hiked the base prices for new plans by $5 in most markets over the past two months.
"Rogers, Telus and Bell Mobility now all charge $80 per month for new smartphone plans with a new contract, $5 more than what many of those same plans cost when they were introduced last year. The prices for other smartphone plans with more data cost upwards of $145." ~ Yahoo News.
So even if he were to do something about it now (after the proverbial horse has been stolen), the damage has already been done.

From a personal perspective, my Bell Canada internet bill has increased from $48 in 2012, to $62 on Jan. 01, 2014, and to $65 in Feb. 2014. That's a 32% increase in roughly two years, so if that doesn't fit the definition of gouging I don't know what would.

And if Flaherty doesn't fit the definition of 'gutless', I don't know who would!

Saturday, March 8, 2014

Today is International Women's Day...

International men's day ... How many know, a) there is one, and b) the date?

"Speaking on behalf of UNESCO, Director of Women and Culture of Peace, Ingeborg Breines, said of IMD, "This is an excellent idea and would give some gender balance." She added that UNESCO was looking forward to cooperating with the organizers."


What Flaherty's 2014 budget DIDN'T do for me and countless other seniors and singles.



There is always a populist element in every budget--both positive and negative. It is, after all, a political statement as well as an economic one, and Flaherty's budget is no different (particularly since there's an election coming up in 2015.) There was the usual 'sin tax' on cigarettes (the negative), and a plethora of child-tax benefits (the positive).

Now bearing in mind that I am a single person, a senior with no dependants, but paying 18% of my income in income tax. So, here's what the budget DIDN'T do for me--and countless other singles with no dependants. Remember, too, that this is in addition to the child benefits at the provincial level.

***

1.      Eligible dependent: If you’re a single parent raising kids, you can qualify for a $10,320 credit that becomes a tax savings of around $1,500. The credit is designed to give lone parents a tax break similar to what married couples get.

2.      Children’s arts credit: Got a budding da Vinci in your brood? Creativity pays! You’re eligible for a $500 per child credit for a variety of artistic, cultural, recreational and developmental activities. So now you can afford to buy little Sophie some paper and an easel, rather than have her do her own interpretation of the Sistine Chapel on your walls.

3.      Education tax credit: Full-time and part-time students are eligible for a basic credit, and since they usually don’t have big incomes, most of the credit ($5,000 minus the amount the student claimed on her tax return) can be transferred to parents. The rules apply to tuition, textbook and other education expenses (sadly, though, you cannot claim for all the beer your student consumed while at weekend “study sessions”).

4.      Transit pass credit: Tired of your kids borrowing the car and returning it with an empty gas tank and a few extra dents? Tell ’em to take the bus from now on! Monthly and yearly passes for your dependent children up to age 19 can be claimed. Passes for streetcars, subways, commuter trains and local ferries count too. (Just don’t try to claim ferry fare if you live in a land-locked city.)

5.      Universal Child Care Benefit: Here’s some more cash you may qualify for: $100 per month per child under the age of 6. The benefit is designed to help families “as they try to balance work and family life,” say the feds, “by supporting their child care choices through direct financial support.” You know what would really help us balance work and children? Less of each, and more cash. Hey, we can dream.

6.      First Time Home Buyers Tax Credit: Not everyone can be like The Old Woman Who Lived in a Shoe (and besides, have you seen the price of shoes these days?). So here’s what to do if you need more space now that kids are here (or on the way): if this is your first home purchase, claim the $5,000 non-refundable tax credit.

7.      Children’s fitness credit: There’s only one Sidney Crosby, but who’s to say your little hockey whiz can’t be the next NHL superstar? Signing your under-16 kids up for organized physical activity such as hockey qualifies you for a credit of up to $500 in costs per child. The feds created this break to promote physical fitness and reduce future health care costs. Your bigger incentive? A cut of the next multi-million-dollar Sidney Crosby-like salary!

8.      Family caregiver tax credit: We’re keeping our fingers crossed that you never need to apply for this one. It provides a $2,000 non-refundable credit for parents who provide ongoing care for their minor child with a physical or mental illness. You’ll need to provide a letter from a medical doctor stating when the impairment began and how long it is expected to last.

9.      Child tax credit: For every child you have under age 18 (19 in Saskatchewan) the federal government allows a credit. It varies by year; in 2012, it was $2,191. Remember, though, that it’s a credit, not a straight deduction. Do the math and you’ll see that it translates into a tax savings of about $329 per kid – or about what you spend on tutors so Sandy can get through math at school without the help of his iPhone.

10.  Child care expenses: This deduction covers costs such as daycare, summer camps, sitters, after-school programs and boarding schools. It can even include the expense of advertising to find child care. You can claim for a child up to 16, as long as the person providing the care isn’t a blood relative (i.e. you can’t pay your spouse to look after your own children, even though he may want danger pay for spending the day cooped up with them in the 

11.  Canadian Child Tax Benefit: Yep, the feds actually pay us for reproducing. This tax-free monthly payment arrives in your bank account every month until your offspring turn 18. The basic benefit is $1,433 ($119.41 a month) but the size of the cheque you get depends on your income, what province you live in, and the number of kids you have. At that rate, not even Octomom would get rich.

12.  Adoption tax credit: If you incur out of pocket expenses while adopting a child, you’re eligible for a tax credit. Costs of up to $11,440 per child can be covered. If the child has special needs you can claim the full amount; otherwise, how much you save depends on how much you spend. Whatever the amount, the real benefit comes from giving someone a new family life – and that’s priceless.



Thursday, March 6, 2014

Harper's proposed electoral reform: Talk about putting the wolf in charge of the sheep...

"It took five years and dozens of spirited denials in the House of Commons before the Conservative party finally pleaded guilty in 2011 to significant overspending in the 2006 campaign — a plea deal that Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre celebrated as a victory.

"Poilievre also frequently rose in the House to defend the government in the ongoing investigation into fraudulent robocalls during the 2011 campaign.

"Poilievre, NOW MINISTER FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORM*, is questioning Mayrand again, dismissing his criticism and declaring him wrong about many of the provisions in the sweeping bill." ~ "Elections watchdog says proposed election law damages level playing field" by 
Joan Bryden and Bruce Cheadle, The Canadian Press.


Elections watchdog says proposed election law damages level playing field

Canada's chief electoral officer has provided fuel to opposition claims that new election rules being proposed by the Harper government are designed to tilt the field in the Conservative party's favour.
The massive rewrite of the Canada Elections Act will increase party spending and decrease voting among some groups, all the while failing to provide the investigative powers needed to get to the bottom of election fraud, Marc Mayrand told a House of Commons committee Thursday.

Other points raised by Mayrand were:

— By ending the practice of "vouching," the bill would disenfranchise tens of thousands of voters who are unable to provide identification with an address, mostly students, the elderly, natives and the poor.
— The bill would muzzle both Mayrand and the elections commissioner, who investigates violations and enforces the Canada Elections Act.
"I'm concerned that during an election we could not issue a press release alerting electors to certain practices that may happen that they should be aware of," said Mayrand, who pointed to events in the 2011 election as an example.
— The bill fails to give investigators the power to demand receipts from parties, who got $33 million in public rebates after the last election without providing documented evidence of expenses.
"It is striking when looking at provincial regimes that we remain the only jurisdiction in Canada where political parties are not required to produce supporting documentation for their reported expenses," Mayrand said.
— The bill creates some new offences and increases penalties, but fails to give elections investigators the powers they need to compel testimony or evidence.

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

'Cisco to open one of four global innovation centre in Toronto; invests $100M'...

screamed a recent headline. It looks pretty good, doesn't it? That is, until you read a headline from a while back (Dec. 13, 2013). It read:

'Tech giant Cisco getting millions from government to expand Ontario workforce'

This article by Maria Babbage, The Canadian Press, reported that "Ontario's Liberals are handing up to $220 million to Cisco Canada as part of a deal that could see the high-tech giant invest as much as $4 billion and create thousands of jobs in the province over the next decade.The news comes amid a rash of pending plant closures by companies that received provincial government subsidies.
[See full article at:  http://ca.news.yahoo.com/cisco-canada-invest-4-billion-ontario-create-1-203107284--finance.html.

It would appear, therefore, that Cisco is merely giving back half of what it has already received from the taxpayers of Ontario (most of whom live outside the GTA), and taking 100% of the credit.

That`s called a 'corporate flim-flam,'


Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Just received my January hydro bill ... Yikes!

You know, the one that Chiarelli said wouldn't increase more than the cost of a cup of Tim Horton's coffee. Well, would you believe ....

$396.38!

Granted this has been one of the coldest winters on record, but the point is that

  • I haven't been there since November
  • The thermostat is set at 15C (60F)
  • Other than the furnace, the only other appliances are the refrigerator and the hot water heater
  • The furnace is brand new, energy efficient
  • and the windows plastic insulated.
In other words, the energy use is the absolute minimum that can be expected. 

Bear in mind as well, that I am a handicapped senior who must retreat to where there is no snow or be house-bound for the duration of winter.

There is only one word for this sort of usurious cost, and that is

Disgusting! 


Sunday, February 23, 2014

"We have seniors across Ontario spending more money on their hydro bill than they're receiving in their old-age security..."

Hydro One CEO must go: Lisa MacLeod


Hydro One executives are running with their tails between their legs, Tory energy critic Lisa MacLeod said Saturday.

"Heads do need to roll, but it needs to start at the top with Hydro One CEO Carmine Marcello," MacLeod said. "It is good to see there is a bit of a shake-up at the moment, but I think it's the CEO has to go."

Two of Hydro One's customer service executives left the company in the wake of provincial ombudsman Andre Marin's investigation into their billing practices, the Toronto Star reported.

Marin announced earlier this month he will conduct "a systemic investigation" of Hydro One's "egregious errors and baffling bills" that focuses on whether the utility company's customer billing practices are transparent and whether its process for responding to customer bill concerns is timely and effective.

"We have seniors across Ontario spending more money on their hydro bill than they're receiving in their old-age security," MacLeod said. "Had the ombudsman not announced he was investigating them, no corrective action would have been taken, and that signals to me they are more worried about what is in the headlines than worried about what's on people's hydro bills."

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Here is the rip off that Flaherty refuses to rein in or even deal with...

Rip Off Alert! How the Credit Card Gravy Train is Running Over You, By Ellen Brown/AlterNet


You pay off your credit card balance every month, thinking you are taking advantage of the “interest-free grace period” and getting free credit. You may even use your credit card when you could have used cash, just to get the free frequent flier or cash-back rewards. But those popular features are misleading. Even when the balance is paid on time every month, credit card use imposes a huge hidden cost on users—hidden because the cost is deducted from what the merchant receives, then passed on to you in the form of higher prices.

Visa and MasterCard charge the merchants about 2% of the value of every credit card transaction, and American Express charges even more. That may not sound like much. But consider that for balances that are paid off monthly (meaning most of them), the banks make 2% or more on a loan averaging only about 25 days (depending on when in the month the charge was made and when in the grace period it was paid). Two percent interest for 25 days works out to a 33.5% return annually (1.02^(365/25) – 1), and that figure may be conservative.

Merchant fees were originally designed as a way to avoid usury and Truth-in-Lending laws. Visa and MasterCard are independent entities, but they were set up by big Wall Street banks, and the card-issuing banks get about 80% of the fees. The annual returns not only fall in the usurious category, but they are returns on other people’s money – usually the borrower’s own money!  Here is how it works . . . .

A must read:

Thursday, February 13, 2014

What Flaherty's budget DIDN'T do for me...

There has been much written and hyped about the 2014 budget, so here is one person's assessment of it. In a few words "smoke and mirrors"



Carless students: The hype is that “updated rules announced in yesterday’s budget remove that restriction, meaning you can have your loan even if you carry a bus pass. Finally: vehicular equality.”

Me: I’m not a student, nor (because of a handicap) can I access public transit. Moreover, the last time I renewed my automobile registration it cost be over $800 because of Ontario’s so-called ‘clean air’ cash grab.

Autism assistance: The budget includes $11.4 million to be spent on vocational training for those with autism spectrum disorders.

Me: Doesn’t apply, except as a charge to my income tax.

Cheaper cell bills when we travel: New rules put caps on what carriers can charge for roaming, and force them to be more transparent about what they’re charging, and why.

Me: My cell phone is turned off when I cross the border, and doesn’t go back on until I get home again. However, my regular cell phone charges are higher than most other jurisdictions, but I notice Flaherty didn’t address that issue (except to express his ‘serious concern’).

Price tags closer to what Americans pay: Flaherty is giving the Competition Bureau greater powers to go after American retailers who charge Canadians more than they do Americans for the same goods.

Me: The key phrase here is “is giving” (future tense), and the devil is often in the details. However, the cross border difference that Flaherty didn’t address is the exorbitant bank charges for things like ‘currency conversion’ (on top of the exchange rate) which can amount to $6 per $100, and ATM charges that add another $3.50.

More consumer protection: Many companies now charge consumers more to continue receiving paper-based bills or use in-branch bank tellers or related traditional banking services. Stronger consumer protection rules will ban these practices and ensure less tech-savvy consumers aren’t charged more in the process.

Me: I’m already an e-bill subscriber, but on the other hand my municipal government doesn’t subscribe to e-billing. So what one level of government gives, the other takes away.

Better Internet access in rural areas: The government is pumping more money - $305 million over the next five years – to expand high-speed Internet access to up to 280,000 more homes. If you live far away from the bright lights of the big city, you’ll be just as connected as you are downtown.

Me: This provision doesn’t apply to me except as another charge on my income tax. However, my complaint is the rates imposed by one of the monopolists that control the Canadian internet industry. For example, my connection rates have gone up from $48 per month to $65 in just the past couple of years. In fact, it went from $58 to $65 in the last month. However, Flaherty did nothing to address this practice.

More help for young job-seekers: The feds set an April 1st deadline to implement the $300 million Canada Job Grant Program. Senior workers in high-unemployment regions will also get $25 million to help them land a job. On the flip side, it may be harder to find jobs with Canadian small businesses after a hiring credit was eliminated.

Me: This program doesn’t apply to me except as a charge on my income tax. However, does this grant go directly to employer or to so-called ‘temp agencies’ that siphon off a large percentage of the employee’s salary?

Help for adoption-seeking families: Families trying to adopt a child will get a tax break. The tax credit will go up from $11,774 to $15,000 and will apply to all adoptions that are finalized from January 1st, 2014 forward.

Me: This give-a-way doesn’t apply to me except as a change on my income tax; but did you know there are already a dozen-or-more child benefit grants or tax credits at the federal level alone, that amount to well over $10,000 per child per year per year. There’s money in them thar kids.

Snowmobilers will go further: $10 million with be given to build new snowmobile trails and improve existing ones.

Me: Oh, joy! When people are being laid off, losing their homes, etc., what we really need is more snowmobile trails. 


Wednesday, February 12, 2014

'Fumbling Flaherty's' budget a cop out...

So much for all the brave talk about reining in cell phone rates, outrageous bank and credit card charges, and ATM fees to get at your own money. Come the morning after, and nothing has changed--not that I every serious thought it would.

The bottom line is there is nothing in this budget that makes my life any easier, and much to my detriment--like getting less in services for more money.

Oh, he was brave enough when it came to adding a tax on cigarettes (what else is new?!), and going after public sector benefits (...Oh, great, let's solve our problems on the backs of workers) but beyond that it's all smoke and mirrors.

He will (someday) bar companies from charging more for goods on the Canadian side of the border, but most companies have brought their prices into line to stay competitive, anyway.

As a snowbird, the cross border shopping prices that affect me are the so-called 'currency conversion' and other bank charges that can amount to a 6% increase on the ticket price whether I pay with a credit card or cash. This, combined with a 10% exchange rate and an ATM fee brings the total surcharge to about 20%.

All of these fall within Flaherty's jurisdiction, but all I got from him was his "serious concern." Yah, right!

And as for cell phone and internet rates. My Bell Canada internet bill mysterious went from $58 to $65 this month, even though I'm not home to use it. Oh, he will make sure the IT companies comply with the Wireless Code of Conduct (whatever that is) such as offering more contract clarity and reducing or eliminating some roaming and cancellation fees. 

That's all very nice, but if I am being gouged now, I'm still going to be gouged when Flaherty gets around to legislating all of this.

This is my response for now, but my final response will come at the polls in 2015.


Monday, February 3, 2014

An open letter to James Flaherty, Minister of Finance for Canada:

[I have long urged everyone to take the time to let your government representative know how you feel, especially if you have a grievance, and even when (rarely I find)  you want to praise them. Here is my example]

Mr. Minister

Although I don't expect this communication to do the least amount of good, apart from generating a letter of 'brush off' intent, as a vacationing, handicapped senior, I am disgusted that the loonie has been allowed to drop to the level it has; i.e. $0.89-cents. This, along with bank charges, which you don't seem to care about either, is enough to make me a prisoner of winter, unable to leave the house with my walker.

For example, 100 USD dolllars taken from an A.T.M. in Florida costs $120.00--$111.00 with currency exchange; an additional $6.00 for 'currency conversion' and bank charges; and $3.00 A.T.M. fee. This utterly outrageous.

And before you lecture me on the benefits to the export industries, i.e. oil industry [$12 billion in profits for Q4, 2013], the gas industry [$4 billion]and General Motors (which is subsidized by the Canadian taxpayers), I will remind you that you are the 'people's representative too, and the trickle-down theory never seems to get down to my level.

As I have said above, I doubt whether this correspondence will do any good whatsoever, but be aware that I am not a happy camper.

Gerry A. Burnie.