BY JERRY
AGAR, TORONTO SUN
Does Premier Kathleen Wynne even
believe the things she says? Do you?
Perhaps she does, since she leads a
province with a multiparty system that allows her to win a majority government
with less than 40% of the vote.
A province where she is the leader
favoured by the bloated public sector unions, not to mention facing a weak
opposition.
And so, like the leader of some
tin-pot dictatorship, perhaps Wynne hears nothing but the sound of her own
voice and has come to believe it.
On budget day last week, Wynne spoke
with Ryan Doyle on Newstalk1010, were I work.
She touted her, “sound fiscal
management.” Beg pardon?
Ontario’s debt is more than twice
that of the state of California. But, of course, California has a larger
economy than Ontario.
In 2014 the Fraser Institute
reported, “The gross debt in the form of bonds is 7.6% of California’s economy,
while it is a whopping 40.9% of Ontario’s economy. Put differently, as a share
of the economy, Ontario’s debt is more than five times larger than
California’s.”
The Fraser Institute reported,
“Ontarians currently owe CA$20,166 per person compared to US$3,844 for
Californians, which is more than five times the per-person level of debt.”
When the Liberals took power in 2003,
Ontario’s public debt was $138.8 billion.
Now it’s $298.9 billion, a 115%
increase.
Wynne’s new budget is long on
infrastructure spending, which is sorely needed, but short on details on where
that money will come from.
Unable to balance the budget, the
Liberals have no money for debt retirement.
The day after the budget, Moody’s
Investors Service issued a report titled, “Moody’s Continues to See Risks in
Ontario’s Budget.”
“We remain attentive to the fact
deficits have shown little progress in the past few years, and in fact have
increased from 8.1% of revenues in 2012/13 to 9.2% in 2014/15”, noted Michael
Yake, a Moody’s VP and lead analyst for the province of Ontario.
He continued: “Achieving the budget’s
goal of reducing the deficit to CA$8.5 billion (6.8% of revenue) in 2015/16
would represent a positive step, but the return to balanced budgets by 2017/18
still faces considerable risks in our view.”
That’s not as sunny an outlook as the
one projected by the Wynne government.
A casual dismissal of the private
sector by Ontario’s premier is illustrative of her beliefs regarding business
and competition.
When Doyle asked about the new
Ontario beer tax she’s imposing ($100 million annually) Wynne said we know from
research if alcohol sales are privatized, prices goes up. The example most
often used is Alberta.
Except studies by the Fraser
Institute disagree, which also show the number of outlets, varieties of beer
available and employment increased.
Indeed, looking to our southern
neighbours, who are within easy driving distance of Queen’s Park, the cost of
30 cans of Labatt beer on special at Consumer’s Beverages in Buffalo, N.Y. is
$19.99 this week.
At The Beer Store in Ontario, 24 cans
cost $46.50. Road trip, anyone?
It isn’t the private sector that has
driven the cost of alcohol through the proverbial roof, the government has.
Basically, Wynne gives us bad fiscal
management and a delusional view of how the private market works.
Heaven help us.
No comments:
Post a Comment